Behavior driven development (BDD) and the Gherkin language, first and foremost, are about collaboration and documentation.
The key idea is to specify the behavior of a software system by describing its features using concrete scenarios
and examples. By describing the scenarios in the language of the domain and by doing this together
with the domain experts, we ensure that each feature is completely covered by its scenarios and that each
scenario is specified correctly.
Using this approach ensures that we build the right system.
We write the scenarios using the Gherkin language which is designed to be both, human and machine readable.
By parsing the scenarios and automating its steps we turn the specification into executable test cases
which verify that the implemented features behave as specified.
Using this approach ensures that we build the system right.
Now, reading raw Gherkin in an IDE is fine when developing and reviewing a particular feature and its
scenarios. But when it comes to providing a long term specification, HTML has clear benefits over Gherkin
with respect to readability of the scenarios and navigation between features.
For this reason I have added support for generating HTML documentation from Gherkin based feature files
to the TickSpec extension
Just recently, I wrote about my BDD approach in one of my projects in this article.
I have used this setup now for a while and it actually worked quite well for me but
there is one thing which turned out to be quite annoying over time.
As already mentioned in other posts, one of my projects is a web application
which aims to bring maximum transparency into backlogs of agile teams. Over time this application grew quite a bit,
accumulated quite some features and got used by more than two dozen teams.
Of course, one important strategy to ensure the quality of this application is test automation. I never followed the classic
testing pyramid which is based on tons of classic unit tests but rather focused on describing features and scenarios in
a kind of a BDD style.
Favoring pragmatic setups, I wrote those tests without any “real” BDD framework which worked quite well for quite
some time, but in the recent weeks and months I realized that my setup needs some improvement.
So I decided to invest some time, do some evaluation and start migrating my tests to a “real” BDD framework
using feature files written in Gherkin language.
What does software development mean to you?
Is it an engineering discipline? It is called “Computer Science”, so is it a science?
And what about the “software craftsmanship” movement? Or is it actually art?
MediatR is a popular library in .NET used to decouple components.
In Clean Architecture we aim to keep the core of the application as independent as possible from
such “details” like third-party libraries and frameworks.
Nevertheless, I have recently read quite some
and watched some great
about using MediatR in Clean Architecture based projects.
But doesn’t the usage of MediatR in Clean Architecture break the Dependency Rule?
If you have at least some professional software engineering experience you probably have heard of BDD
and probability is high that you just think of Gherkin and GIVEN-WHEN-THEN when you think of BDD.
But actually BDD is much, much more as this book illustrates:
Obviously, you must write code such that the resulting software works as desired.
That’s no longer the main problem of software engineering. The challenge is
to organize it so that it fits in your brain. Code must be humane.
– Mark Seemann, Code that fits in your head
The goal of software design is to create chunks or slices that fit into a human mind.
The software keeps growing but the human mind maxes out, so we have to
keep chunking and slicing differently if we want to keep making changes.
– Kent Beck
You should aim for an architecture of your code base so that regardless of where you look,
the code fits in your head. At a high level, there’s seven or fewer things going on.
In the low-level code, there’s at most seven tings you have to keep track of.
At the intermediary level, this still holds.
– Mark Seemann, Code that fits in your head
In .Net the source code of a finally block is always called, right?
Even if there is a return statement or an exception is thrown in the try block, correct?
I mean, this is the reason why we use try-finally in the first place.
Well, I got into a case where the code of the finally block was not called …